Thursday, November 18, 2010
Of Compassion toward One's Neighbor.
Sunday, November 7, 2010
Imperfect obedience
Admonition 3b day 6
Imperfect obedience
However, if a Superior orders a Subject to do something against their own soul they are allowed to disobey, but they must not leave their Superior, And if in consequence they suffer persecution from some of their companions, they must love them all the more for God’s sake.
For those who were willing to endure persecution rather than wish to be separated from their companions, truly abide in perfect obedience for they lay down their lives for their fellows.
For there are many Religious who in retrospect, see better things for themselves than their Superior commands, return to the vomit of their own self will. These are (like) murderers who by their bad example cause the loss of many souls.
“If however a Superior orders a subject to do something against their own soul” I would write ‘conscience’ here instead of soul.
If a Superior in Religion asked, no, ordered a Subject to do something against their conscience then it must be something grave because I do not visualise a subject disobeying because of something trite. Francis tells us that “they are allowed to disobey” for, as we all realise, we do damage to ourselves when we act against our own conscience. Francis says ‘must’; the subjects can disobey their Superiors but must remain with them, that is why the obedience is imperfect.
Consequently should the Subjects suffer persecution from their companions rather than be separated from them then they must love them all the more and in doing so lay down their lives for their companions.
In finishing, Francis considers that the Religious who look back on the lives they lived before they entered the Order and think they might have done better for themselves than their superior commands “return to the vomit of their own self-will” – and are murders because their bad example can lead to others losing their souls.
Friday, November 5, 2010
Of Perfect Obedience
Friday, October 29, 2010
Day 1. Admonition 1a. Of The Lord's Body.
Of The Lord’s Body.
The Lord Jesus said to His disciples: “I am the Way, and the Truth, and the Life. No
man comes to the Father, but by Me. If you had known Me you would, without
doubt, have known My Father also: and from henceforth you shall know Him, and
you have seen Him. Philip said to Him: Lord, show us the Father, and it is enough for
us. Jesus said to him: Have I been so long a time with you and have you not known
Me? Philip, he that sees Me sees [My] Father also. How can you say, Show us the
Father?”
1 The Father “inhabits light inaccessible,”2 and “God is a spirit,”3 and “no
man has seen God at any time.”4 Because God is a spirit, therefore it is only by the
spirit He can be seen, for “it is the spirit that quickens; the flesh profits nothing.”5
Francis quotes Jesus as saying “if you had known me” as in those who know Jesus know the Father, implying that those who do not know Jesus do not know His Father.
Despite his years as Jesus’ disciple, Philip seems not to have known Jesus because he does not know the Father. Jesus then tells Philip that in seeing and knowing Jesus he will both know and see the Father.
Perhaps, in analysing the Trinity as the Triune God and in attempting to organise the three persons' of God in an acceptable monotheistic form, we may miss the whole point. Namely, that God was in Christ reconciling the world to Himself, not counting (our)trespasses against (us), and He has committed to us the word of reconciliation. (2 Corinthians 5:19 NASB)
I rather think that Francis was unknowingly leaning towards Panentheism, seeing God as both very nearby in Creation and yet much greater than it, we only need to read his Canticle of the Creatures to discern this:
There is only God whether in Jesus or the Spirit, our Deity can be seen and perceived in Jesus, and in the wind, blowing wherever it pleases (John 3:8); in the tallest trees and the deepest seas, in the hottest fire, our God is everywhere and in everything.
We shall stop with this because if we try to explain it further we return to the sticky web of Trinity